CSE 5914
Transcript Abbreviation:
Cpstn: Knowl Sys
Course Description:
Capstone design project; conceptual and technical design; theory and practice of knowledge-based systems; teamwork, written and oral communication skills.
Course Levels:
Undergraduate (1000-5000 level)
Graduate
Designation:
Elective
General Education Course
(N/A)
Cross-Listings
(N/A)
Credit Hours (Minimum if “Range”selected):
4.00
Max Credit Hours
(N/A)
Select if Repeatable:
Off
Maximum Repeatable Credits
(N/A)
Total Completions Allowed
(N/A)
Allow Multiple Enrollments in Term:
No
Course Length:
14 weeks (autumn or spring)
12 weeks (summer only)
Off Campus:
Never
Campus Location:
Columbus
Instruction Modes:
In Person (75-100% campus; 0-24% online)
Prerequisites and Co-requisites:
Prereq: 3521, or 5521; and 2501, or Philos 1338, or 2338; and CSE 3901, or 3902, or 3903; and GenEd 1201 or GenEd 2601; and GE writing and comm course: level 2, or GE foundation writing and info literacy course; or Grad standing.
Electronically Enforced:
Yes
Exclusions
(N/A)
Course Goals / Objectives:
Master task-level analysis and problem solving methods for configuration (design) problems;
Be competent with methods for representing and reasoning with uncertain knowledge;
Be familiar with the analysis and methods of diagnosis problems;
Be familiar with the analysis and methods of diagnosis problems;
Master synthesizing and applying prior knowledge to designing and implementing solutions to open-ended computational problems while considering multiple realistic constraints;
Be competent in evaluating design alternatives;
Be competent with software design and development practices and standards;
Be familiar with researching and evaluating computing tools and practices for solving given problems;
Be competent with deadline driven projects in a team setting;
Be competent with issues of project management, such as teamwork, project scheduling, individual and group time management
Be competent with presenting work to a group of peers
Be familiar with presenting work to a range of audiences
Be familiar with presenting work to a range of audiences
Be competent with techniques for effective written communication for a range of purposes (user guides, design documentation, storyboards etc.);
Be familiar with analyzing professional issues, including ethical, legal and security issues, related to computing projects;
Master task-level analysis and problem solving methods for classification problems;
GE Reflection-Engag Citizens & Intercultr Comp: Students consider public health, safety, and welfare as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors in applying engineering design to produce solutions meeting specified needs.
GE Reflection - Personal and Professional Development: Students individually assess and pursue personal professional growth in concert with project requirements and personal career goals.
GE Reflection - Cultivate Engineering Mindset: Students develop an engineering mindset that demonstrates constant curiosity, makes connections between disparate bodies of information, and seeks opportunities to create value.
Check if concurrence sought:
No
Contact Hours:
| Topic | LEC | REC | LAB | LAB Inst |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction and overview | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Natural language processing tools | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Configuration and design | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Reasoning with uncertain knowledge | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Cloud-based question answering architectures | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Current trends: Information search systems in industry | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Design meetings, team work | 16.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Presentations | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Grading Plan:
Letter Grade
Course Components:
Lecture
Grade Roster Component:
Lecture
Credit by Exam (EM):
No
Grades Breakdown:
| Aspect | Percent |
|---|---|
| Technical presentations | 35% |
| Final project | 60% |
| Attendance | 5% |
Representative Textbooks and Other Course Materials:
| Title | Author | Year |
|---|---|---|
| No Textbooks and Other Course Materials Entered. | ||
ABET-CAC Criterion 3 Outcomes:
| Outcome | Contribution | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | Analyze a complex computing problem and to apply principles of computing and other relevant disciplines to identify solutions. |
| 2 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | Design, implement, and evaluate a computing-based solution to meet a given set of computing requirements in the context of the program’s discipline. |
| 3 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts. |
| 4 | Substantial contribution (3-6 hours) | Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles |
| 5 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program’s discipline |
ABET-ETAC Criterion 3 Outcomes
(N/A)
ABET-EAC Criterion 3 Outcomes:
| Outcome | Contribution | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics |
| 2 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors |
| 3 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences - pre-2019 EAC SLO (g) |
| 4 | Substantial contribution (3-6 hours) | an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts |
| 5 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives |
| 6 | Some contribution (1-2 hours) | an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions |
| 7 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies |
Embedded Literacies Info
(N/A)
Attachments
(N/A)
Additional Notes or Comments
(N/A)