MECHENG 4902.01
Transcript Abbreviation:
Capstone 2: StuP
Course Description:
First course of 2-semester capstone sequence. Students work on design problems arising from various student competitions in engineering. Emphasis on problem definition, requirements, and design proposal.
Course Levels:
Undergraduate (1000-5000 level)
Designation:
Required
General Education Course
(N/A)
Cross-Listings
(N/A)
Credit Hours (Minimum if “Range”selected):
2.50
Max Credit Hours
(N/A)
Select if Repeatable:
Off
Maximum Repeatable Credits
(N/A)
Total Completions Allowed
(N/A)
Allow Multiple Enrollments in Term:
No
Course Length:
14 weeks (autumn or spring)
12 weeks (summer only)
7 weeks (autumn or spring)
Off Campus:
Never
Campus Location:
Columbus
Instruction Modes:
In Person (75-100% campus; 0-24% online)
Prerequisites and Co-requisites:
Prereq: 3360, 3671, 3503, 3870, and GenEd 1201 or 2601. Prereq or concur: 4510, and enrollment as a MechEng-BS Student, or permission of instructor
Electronically Enforced:
Yes
Exclusions
(N/A)
Course Goals / Objectives:
Student will understand design as a process
Student will understand design as a process
Students will appreciate the challenges and complexity of the design process.
Students will appreciate design as a process for taking an idea or need from concept to realization of a deliverable (component, system, process).
Students develop key professional and project management related skills and understand their relationship to the design process.
Students appreciate design as the culminating ability and skill arising from their studies.
GE Reflctn Booknd LO: Engaged Citiznshp & Intercultural Competency: Studnts consider public health, safety, welfare, global, cultural, social, environmental, & econ factors in applying eng design to produce solutions meeting specified needs
GE Reflctn Booknd LO: Personal & Professional Development: Students individually assess and pursue personal professional growth in concert with project requirements and personal career goals.
GE Reflctn Booknd LO: Cultivate Engineering Mindset: Students develop an engineering mindset that demonstrates constant curiosity, makes connections between disparate bodies of information, and seeks opportunities to create value.
Check if concurrence sought:
No
Contact Hours:
| Topic | LEC | REC | LAB | LAB Inst |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project pitch and group formation Stakeholder definition/user needs determination/empathy in design | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Root Cause Analysis / Fishbone Diagrams / Technology Survey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Top Level Requirements Creation Solution Concept Development/Brainstorming, Sketches, and Mockups | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk / Skill / Knowledge Gap Assessment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Project Planning and Documentation/Project Management Background Research/Standards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Requirements Generation/ Functional Analysis/Requirements Propagation & Review | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Concept Evaluation & Selection/Decision Making Tools | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Test Plan Creation/Simulation & Analysis Planning | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fault Tree Analysis/DFMEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Activity List Creation / Budget Plan / Materials Selection / Fabrication Methods | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Engineering Ethics | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Status Updates from Teams/Weekly Reports | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peer Feedback | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Preliminary Design presentation—via poster, presentation, and/or written report | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Grading Plan:
Letter Grade
Course Components:
Lecture
Grade Roster Component:
Lecture
Credit by Exam (EM):
No
Grades Breakdown:
| Aspect | Percent |
|---|---|
| Progress Reports | 10% |
| Design Notebooks | 15% |
| Problem Definition and Design Specifications | 10% |
| Midterm Report | 15% |
| Oral Presentations | 10% |
| Miscellaneous Homework Assignments | 15% |
| End of Semester Report and Presentation | 25% |
Representative Textbooks and Other Course Materials:
| Title | Author | Year |
|---|---|---|
| No Textbooks and Other Course Materials Entered. | ||
ABET-CAC Criterion 3 Outcomes
(N/A)
ABET-ETAC Criterion 3 Outcomes
(N/A)
ABET-EAC Criterion 3 Outcomes:
| Outcome | Contribution | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics |
| 2 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors |
| 3 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences - pre-2019 EAC SLO (g) |
| 4 | Substantial contribution (3-6 hours) | an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts |
| 5 | Significant contribution (7+ hours) | an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives |
| 6 | Some contribution (1-2 hours) | an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions |
| 7 | Some contribution (1-2 hours) | an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies |
Embedded Literacies Info
(N/A)
Attachments
(N/A)
Additional Notes or Comments
(N/A)